In what cases will the wife pay alimony to her husband?
In all matters relating to child support, Israeli law is based on Jewish law, which states that the obligation to pay child support applies to the father.
Foods Children Used for the children’s daily subsistence and paid to the mother, when the children are in her custody.
However, in light of the social and economic changes and developments in the traditional family, the courts have expanded the obligation to pay alimony to include another option, in which the wife is the one who will be obligated to pay alimony to her husband, and this, of course, according to her earning capacity.
When a father files a lawsuit for custody of the children, judges consider this to be an agreement on his part to take care of their needs in his home. In the event that the judgment determines that the children are in the father’s custody, he is obligated to pay Alimony For necessary needs and also for needs that are not covered by charity, such as travel, classes, and gifts.
For a personal conversation with an experienced lawyer, call: 077-997-4020 (24 hours a day)
As long as the father is responsible for paying child support for necessary needs, the mother is not obligated to pay child support, especially if her financial situation does not allow it.
However, if the mother’s salary is higher than the father’s, this will be taken into account in light of the Ohana and Tsinboy ruling. According to this ruling, the father’s disposable income is calculated, after the payment of child support, and the disposable income of both spouses is taken into account together, in order to create a more equitable distribution.
Therefore, in the case where the father is the custodial parent, he is still responsible for paying child support for necessary needs and the mother is not obligated to pay child support for the children’s existential needs, but if the mother’s salary is significantly high and it is proven that she is indeed wealthy, the burden can be divided between both parents and the woman will be obligated to participate in child support payments to pay for needs under the law of charity.
In most cases, the tendency of My family Family Law And the rabbinical courts, is to require the father to pay minimum child support for his children of at least 1,150 NIS for basic needs and half of the amount of child support for charitable needs.
In those situations where the court tends to rule that the wife is the one who will pay alimony to the husband, the ruling is based on several rules.
The wife will pay alimony! These are the rules…
First, for children under the age of 6, the payment of child support for basic needs applies only to the father, and the mother is not obligated to participate, even if the father has custody and her financial situation is stable.
Second, the obligation to pay child support by the mother to her children only applies in the case of non-basic needs, known as charitable needs. The ruling determined that in a situation where the father is custodial and the mother is affluent, the children can claim charitable needs from the mother, in order to achieve maximum equality within the framework of the law.
The ruling also established two principled ways to protect the child’s well-being and needs while at the same time achieving a balance between the spouses. The first is to reduce the basic child support component, which the father is obligated to pay, to the minimum amount, and at the same time to determine charitable child support, which both parents are obligated to pay in proportion to their income.
A second option is to adopt the rules of honesty of Hebrew law, which are marked by “Do what is right and just” – Deuteronomy 6:18 as well as using “Do what is right and just” – Deuteronomy 12:25.
These rules may answer unclear questions and fill in the gaps, in exceptional cases where traditional child support laws are difficult to apply and in situations where there is a significant economic gap in favor of the mother, which are still considered relatively rare..
Another issue that appears in the child support paragraph for the custodial father is accommodation fees. In a situation where the custodial father must pay accommodation fees, which include the payment of child support up to the minimum amount, the purpose of which is to finance the cost of housing the children while they are staying with the mother.
At the heart of the sections of the law and court rulings dealing with alimony paid by the wife is the principle of equality.
respect The judge Yehuda Granit The Tel Aviv District Family Court ruled that Section 3A of the Alimony Law should be followed, which states that the father and mother of a minor are obligated to pay their child’s support and that, regardless of the custodial parent, the support applies to the parents, in proportion to their income.
The Supreme Court’s egalitarian ruling also determined that, in the context of the appropriate balance in assessing the amount of child support a father must pay to his children, beyond their essential needs, weight must be given to his financial ability and his own needs. This egalitarian ruling by the Supreme Court set a precedent for additional rulings in lower courts as well.
By procedure TAMSH 1886/04 A L and A H N P L In the Jerusalem Family Court, it was determined that in the event that the children are held in the custody of the father and the mother’s financial situation is stable, the children can demand that the mother pay child support, intended for needs that go beyond basic needs, in order to achieve possible equality within the framework of the law.
Another interesting case can be found in a precedent-setting ruling by the judge. Esperanza Oak In the Haifa Family Court in March 2012, refers to a case in which it was determined that the mother would pay child support.
The ruling ruled that the woman would be the one to pay child support for her 13-year-old son, who is in the custody of his father, on the grounds that financially the mother is more well-off than the father.
The background to the case is a relationship between a couple who have a child together out of wedlock. When the child reached the age of one, the parents separated and the child was held in the custody of the mother, while she received child support from the father.
At a later stage, the child was transferred to the father’s custody. Despite the similar salary, Judge Alon was impressed that the mother’s assets, who practices law, were significantly greater than those of the father, and therefore she should be required to pay child support, although at a rate that was about half that set for the father during the period in which he paid child support, an amount that was about 2,300 NIS per month. Therefore, the amount was set at only about 1,200 NIS.
According to the judge, a division of family expenses that matches income should be maintained even when the couple lives separately, based on the interpretation of Jewish law, in light of the changes that have occurred in the traditional family, and out of respect for the value of equality.
Click here to contact her and receive personal legal advice from an experienced lawyer!
